Skip to main content

About this Show

Erin Burnett Out Front

News/Business. Erin Burnett. (2013) New.

NETWORK
CNN

DURATION
00:59:58

RATING

SCANNED IN
San Francisco, CA, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Virtual Ch. 759 (CNN HD)

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
1920

PIXEL HEIGHT
1080

TOPIC FREQUENCY

John Boehner 13, Boehner 10, Washington 7, Us 7, Mmm 6, Obama 5, U.s. 5, America 5, Erin 4, Afghanistan 4, Iran 4, Iraq 4, Pentagon 4, Cnn 4, Bill Burton 3, Erin Burnett 3, Susan Rice 3, Chris Lawrence 3, Transocean 3, Clinton 3,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  CNN    Erin Burnett Out Front    News/Business. Erin  
   Burnett.  (2013) New.  

    January 3, 2013
    4:00 - 4:59pm PST  

4:00pm
fluttering. >> reporter: otto and partner gary graph plan to launch a business, in a few months, selling slightly smaller remote-controlled figures for under $500 each. the buyers would assemble and customize their superheroes. >> what i really like to show off are her stiletto heels on the back. >> reporter: she's very shapely, actually. >> she actually started as a nose art. >> reporter: modeled after pinup girls, but supergirl's anatomy offered engineering opportunities. you mean, her breasts are actually landing gear? >> yes. >> silicone implants, so that she would roll along the ground and do graceful landings. >> reporter: while the males have to resort of to sort of sticking their landings, she's shapelier than a speeding bullet. jeanne moos, cnn -- hey, get your hands off her, gary!
4:01pm
>> is my wife going to see this? >> reporter: -- new york. >> that's it for us. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. "outfront" tonight, speaker of the house, john boehner, kept his job. not everyone, though, is happy. we'll talk to a member of his own party who voted against him. plus, a prominent newspaper columnist suggests president obama is a disappointment. and sweeping changes to america's gun laws, proposed, when police would be able to confiscate your guns. a possibly huge move. let's go "outfront." good evening, everyone. i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, drama, intrigue, tears, it was almost byzantine. under fire, john boehner narrowly won a first round vote to keep his job as house speaker. it's pretty amazing, because the last time the first round of voting was too close to call was 1923. so after all the votes were
4:02pm
meticulously counted, boehner's tally topped out at 220. that is only six more than the bare minimum he needed to keep his job. now, as for the tears, of course, they did come from none other than john boehner. in an emotional victory speech to his house members after the narrow victory. >> if you come here humbled by the opportunity to serve, if you've come here to be the determined voice of the people, if you've come here to carry the standard of leadership, demanded not by our constituents, but by the times, then you've come to the right place. >> outfront tonight, one republican who did not support john boehner today was not moved by those tears. freshman congressman, ted yoho of florida.
4:03pm
today was your first day in congress and you came out with a strong statement. let me just play for you how your vote for speaker went down. here it is. >> you know, if you sign a pledge like that, you've got handcuffs on. >> that is the -- sorry, wrong sound bite there. do we have it? okay, here it is. sorry, let me play it for you again, sir. >> yoho? cantor? >> all right. you voted for majority leader eric cantor, not john boehner. that took some guts on your first day. how come? >> erin, what i did is -- what we did is, we were challenging leadership, to let them know that we're going to hold them accountable, just lake i get held accountable in my district by my constituents. and i want to let them know that we're watching. and we're willing to work with leadership, and i wanted to let him know we're doing that. that's why i stuck with the republican party, with mr.
4:04pm
cantor. >> you were quoted in the national journal as saying, "career politicians created this mess, or at least they didn't do anything to prevent it." >> right. >> so you term limited yourself, you said, to eight years. so should everyone face that limit, even those already in office? >> well, i think people ought to limit themselves. you know, i set that limit of eight years, because i figured that was good enough for george washington, it's good enough for me. you know, the founders didn't intend for us to make a living out of this or that long of a career. that's for each person to decide. me, personally, i decided for eight years. it goes back to what i said there. you know, our message that got us here was that the career politicians did get us here. and they either led us to where we were at or they failed to prevent it. neither is acceptable. this is a time we need to put america first, not so much a political party, the parties are important, but it's more important to put our country first. and i look forward to doing that and i let leadership know that i'm willing to work for them, work with them, but yet, i'm also willing to stand up against them. >> and, let me ask you, though,
4:05pm
in terms of john boehner. you know, now he's one, you didn't vote for him, but he's going to be leading your party, he's the speaker of the house. so the bill that he allowed to come to the floor, the fiscal cliff bill that is now law, that the president has signed, would you have supported the speaker and voted for that, or would you, like eric cantor, have gone against the speaker? >> i would have gone against that. you know, with what i've read. >> and then how can you then vote for john boehner -- i know you voted for eric cantor, but how can you say you're going to work with john boehner and go along with him when you totally disagreed with what he did? >> well, what we have to do is be able to stand up and willing to challenge them on the tough decisions and hopefully be a part of that decision making, to where you can say, i don't think that's the right direction or maybe the right messaging that we need to get out. and being willing to stand up and do that, i think, is more important that they know where you come from, from the very beginning, but yet, let them know that you're going to work with leadership, because he is our leader. and i'm 100% behind him, just
4:06pm
like mr. obama, president obama is our president. and, you know, they are the people in charge right now. and so we've got to do the best we can. and again, this goes back to do the best we can for the country. and that's what i'm up here for. >> let me ask you, some people might listen to you right now and say, all right, you're going to be one of those people who's never going to vote for taxes to go up. you're going to be on the more right wing of your party. you know, a lot of others like you have been causing problems for john boehner. but yet, those people might be surprised that you said you will not sign grover norquist's pledge on taxes. so, it sounds like you're saying, look, i'm willing for taxes to go up in the right situation. >> well, again, you know, if you look over the course of the past 30 to 40 years, the republicans have been in charge and the democrats have been in charge. and our country is falling -- it's going in the wrong direction. and this is a time, again, not to put a party first, but put the country first. and if we put the country first, we take the focus off of ourselves in a party, and we put the focus on what's best for
4:07pm
this country. and that's what we have to do. and it's going to take a give and take from both sides. >> do you think that republican lawmakers, who supported the fiscal cliff deal, the bill you said you would have voted against, should face primary challenges in 2014? and obviously, that doesn't just include people like john boehner, it includes people like paul ryan. >> well, i think that most of them are going to face challenges, just the way that our electoral process works. but should they? because they voted that way? that's for their constituents to decide, not me. and their constituents will let them know. >> all right, well, congressman yoho, nice to meet you, although virtually, thanks. >> erin, appreciate it. same here. >> we'll see you again soon. now let's bring in john avalon, cnn contributor of "newsweek" and the daily beast. what do you make of that? come in on day one and make a stand against boehner? >> a bold move on day one to go against speaker boehner.
4:08pm
he claeearly did it from a position of principle. he took on a republican congressman, ran a great ad, depicting politicians as pigs at the trough. he's got a very anti-establishment message. and to his credit, he says, look, we need to find a way to work against party lines and he's not saning any pledges. that's a hopeful pledge. but i was really struck, not just by his vote, but the dozen or so folks that voted against boehner and how close this came. >> six votes? >> yeah. >> that's pretty incredible. >> erin, we discussed, sources on the hill have been saying for weeks, boehner's safe, boehner's safe, this turned out to be a real nail biter. it does show that boehner's got a real problem holding together his conference. the lessons he takes from it will be fascinating. but the vote revealed the fault lines beneath the republican party. i mean, when you see, paul brewnan and louie gohmert voting for alan west, that's one segment of the republican party. and it really does show that john boehner -- >> there were some interesting write-ins there. >> i personally kind of dug the colin powell write-in, but it is a significant thing, because
4:09pm
boehner's a deal maker. and to some extent, he's being punished for it by the far right of his own party. and that's one possible outcome. around 50 votes, he cannen count on if he does anything with democrats. that's the reality of divided country. >> right, when he put forth the so-called plan "b," it got shot down, because there were some republicans that wouldn't allow taxes to go up on anybody. >> and they ended up getting a worse deal. if those 50 or so folks saying we're fiscal conservative absolutists had backed boehner, they probably would have got a better deal on taxes and maybe even a grand bargain that dealt with entitlement reform as well. of course, the bill that passed didn't have anything of it. >> people like congressman yoho will be some very interesting ones to watch. by the way, fascinating man. large animal veterinarian. >> large animal vet. we need more of those in congress. >> and there's a reindeer farmer, also. >> yes, there is. >> in congress. this will be fun. "outfront" next, a prominent newspaper columnist slams
4:10pm
president obama. it caught our eye. that's next. and an update on hillary clinton and her condition, and what she says she's going to do about that benghazi testimony we've all been waiting for. and a new report from the pentagon reveals some, well, totally new details about iran's spies. i've always kept my eye on her... but with so much health care noise, i didn't always watch out for myself. with unitedhealthcare, i get personalized information and rewards for addressing my health risks. but she's still going to give me a heart attack. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.
4:11pm
4:12pm
4:13pm
our second story "outfront," slamming the president. "washington post" reporter and columnist david ignatius, who has covered six american presidents, suggests president obama is a disappointment. here's ignatius. "rather than come to the table with a grand vision of his own, a real strategy for cutting the deficit and the entitlement programs that drive it, obama played a poker game of incremental bargaining with house speaker john boehner. unfortunately, obama has been playing a waiting game on fiscal issues ever since he became president." "outfront" tonight, former white house deputy press secretary, bill burton. bill, there were some pretty harsh words here, tough words. obviously, david ignatius saying, here's how the president could turn it around, but pretty frustrated with his leadership on fiscal issues. and of course, we just had a deal that ended up boosting
4:14pm
spending and slashing revenue, which is not sort of the whole goal, right? so what do you think about david ignatius' point? the president needs to be bigger and come up with a plan? >> well, it's hard for me to see how somebody on the left, anybody who supports the president, could be disappointed with the deal that the president just got. think of what just happened. he got republicans to vote for a tax increase for the first time since 1990. he saved unemployment insurance, extended it, without having pay-fors in it. extended the earned income tax credit, extended the wind energy tax credit. and even got the rates back to where he wanted to get the rates. now, we're in a divided government. you're not going to get every single thing that you want, but the president got some really big things, made some real progress. and if you look at the base line that everybody compares, you know, where the budget is to everything else, actually, this does cut the deficit by $737 billion. so i think the president made big progress here and we're going to have to see going forward how we're going to be able to deal with the looming crisis that we face in the next
4:15pm
couple of months. >> bill burton has just shown why he was the deputy press secretary. and i mean that, bill, as a compliment. but, in all seriousness, he's giving the spin on that. so what do you say? >> well, i think that when you look at president obama's priorities, it's important to keep in mind that deficit reduction isn't necessarily his biggest priority right now, for the simple reason that there's a lot of anxiety among folks in the white house that if you have too fast of fiscal contraction, it can be really bad for the economy. so i think from his perspective, he's not necessarily prioritizing reforming medicare and what have you over the long-term. he wants to be sure to have a successful presidency and to protect his legacy. and the core of his legacy is actually his health care reform. so if he has that in place, i think he believes -- >> so he doesn't care about this stuff, is what you're saying? >> i'm not going to say that he doesn't care, but i think what he would like is a deal in which he gets some credit for a very modest tweak to social security and get republican buy-in in on that. that way he feels like a
4:16pm
bipartisan leader. but fundamentally, i don't think he really cares about near-term deficits all that much. >> bill, is that fair, or should the president be stepping up and saying, look, here is my vision on reforming entitlements. we can't afford the promises that we've made. i am now done aft this term, so i'll give you the tough love and put that plan forward and give you a major legacy? >> i don't think that necessarily stands up to where you've seen the president. the president, first of all, in health care reform, there is some medicare reform. secondly, what he was attacked for, relentlessly for republicans all through this last cycle. second of all, the president has said repeatedly in his public remarks that he is very committed to medicare reform. the problem is you've got mitch mcconnell out there saying that he doesn't have a dance partner on the dance floor, but the president doesn't have somebody he can work with in the house. when john boehner comes to the table and he can't even bring his deputy or his third in command to vote for the deal that he is agreeing to, i think you've got a real crisis of leadership in the house. and so the president showed that even in that case, he can get a deal that moves the ball forward for the country, but going
4:17pm
forward, you just wonder, how much control does boehner have over the folks in the house and what kind of deals are we going to be able to get? >> reihan, just to the point, he could say, i am going to set a vision for what america must be. that's what david ignatius is saying he's not doing. is that charge fair? >> i think that's absolutely fair, but the mistake is this, president obama doesn't really care about this kind of grand bargain approach. he wants to be sure that his expansion of the welfare state and health reform is there, is durable, that it lasts beyond his presidency. and i think that's why it's really a waiting game, rather than about getting a big deficit bargain. >> well, he got a few taxes. a lot of little sneaky medicare taxes. >> a lot more tax on the health reform. >> david ignatius goes on, though, to talk about the president's strategy in terms of filling his cabinet. also critical on that. he says, he floated the names of susan rice and chuck hagel out there for secretary of defense
4:18pm
and secretary of state. ignatius then says, "obama has been backing into the second term in his cabinet choices, too. these are unnecessary, self-inflicted wounds for the administration." also criticizing how he handles that. so making small decisions, not big ones. >> well, i'm sort of surprised to see that from david ignatius, frankly. because this isn't the first time he's seen a nomination process where names leak out, people rise to the top, fall to the bottom. >> yeah. >> for starters, susan rice is one of the most talented people in this administration and would have been an awesome secretary of state. but she pulled out because it was her decision to stop all the distractions that she was causing. so to criticize the president for the noise that republicans make or the noise that anybody else is making from the outside on people who haven't even been chosen for cabinet posts is silly on its face. it's washington and that's the washington game that people play. >> bill has a fair point. >> well, there are folks who are
4:19pm
defenders of susan rice and chuck hagel would put it somewhat differently. their view is, they don't have the white house's opposition team. they don't have formidable folks like bill burton who are arguing on their behalf. their names were floated, put out there pretty much on their own. if you have the formal backing of the white house, then you can make it more of a fight. my own view is that both of those names that were floated were not necessarily the best choices for the country. but regardless, if you actually are going to back them, you ought to back them 100%. >> all right. well, thanks very much to both of you. we appreciate it, both very formidable. still to come, new information about american troops in afghanistan. when they're going to come home and who is going to be staying. and some shocking allegations of rape in ohio with evidence, video posted on the web. again? it's embarrassing it's embarrassing! we can see you carl. we can totally see you. come on you're better than this...all that prowling around.
4:20pm
yeah, you're the king of the jungle. have you thought about going vegan carl? hahaha!! you know folks who save hundreds of dollars by switching to geico sure are happy. how happy are they jimmy? happier than antelope with night-vision goggles. nice! get happy. get geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. we don't let frequent heartburn come between us and what we love. so if you're one of them people who gets heartburn and then treats day after day... block the acid with prilosec otc and don't get heartburn in the first place!
4:21pm
[ male announcer ] one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn.
4:22pm
4:23pm
our third story "outfront," americans forced to stay in afghanistan. we have new details tonight about just how many american troops are going to remain in the country and risk their lives after the bulk of u.s. forces leave next year. cnn pentagon correspondent chris lawrence is "outfront" on the story. >> reporter: the options are on the table. at the low end, a little more than 6,000 troops, mostly special operations forces hunting terrorists, with a small amount of training for afghan
4:24pm
forces. the 10,000 option would still focus on al qaeda, but would add conventional troops to expand afghan training. a 15,000 option would include even more conventional troops to go on limited patrols and give the afghans even more support. some experts say forget that last option, 15,000. >> it's not politically tenable within congress. it's not doable from a budget execution perspective. >> reporter: analyst stephanie sanok worked in baghdad and developed options for the iraq drawdown. she says between war fatigue and spending cuts, even the middle option may be a reach. >> my guess is you will end up closer to the 6,000 person option than the 10,000 person option. >> reporter: analyst jeff dressler argues the u.s. will still have to keep helicopter crews, medical teams, and other backup for whatever troops are left. >> just keeping 6,000 probably isn't that much cheaper than just keeping 15,000, because there's basic things that you need to have there just for the
4:25pm
6. >> reporter: dressler says lowball options are minimizing the danger any remaining troops could face. >> i would argue that even with 20,000 troops, you're still assuming quite a bit of risk. it's by no means a low-risk option. >> general john alan presented these options in one of his last acts as commander. but general joseph dunfer, the man taking alan's place next month, admits he wasn't included in the talks over options. that could signal some tense fights with members of congress, who are skeptical of the drawdown plan. >> senator, i have not been included in those conversations. >> boy, that's interesting to me. a guy that's going to take over the command has not even been included in those conversations. >> reporter: so what's the big-picture goal? in an interview with cnn's erin burnett in afghanistan, a defense secretary said the terrorists just have to be defeated, not decimated. >> i think that you can reach a point where you so significantly weaken al qaeda that, you know,
4:26pm
although there may still be a few people around, they won't be able to conduct the operations that they've conducted in the past. >> all right, chris lawrence is with me now. chris, what i'm curious about, leon panetta in november said to reporters, we'll have a troop count number in a couple weeks from the president. a couple weeks went by, he said, i'll have a troop count number in a couple of weeks. and when i saw him mid-december, he said, some time soon. then we get this range of 6,000 to 15,000. why is it taking so long and why don't we have a real number? >> well, erin, bottom line is the military, the magic number is three. they love to give options. basically, what you do is say, if you want to do this, here's how many troops you'll need. if you only want to do this, you'll only need this many troops. remember back when they were deciding the afghanistan surge, the options came to president obama's 80,000, 40,000, and 10,000, he opted for about 30. as to why it's taking so long, it's because this isn't the
4:27pm
first time the white house is going to be hearing these numbers. there have been back and forth conversations all along, because you don't want to put out a range of options, to say the lowest option would be 30,000 troops, and the president only has plans to authorize, say, 5 to 10. that's going to put him in somewhat of a box and open him up to criticism that he's abandoning the commanders on the ground. >> all right. chris lawrence, thank you very much. as everyone in this country waits to see what that number will be. "outfront" next, sweeping changes to america's gun laws proposed. police could be allowed to confiscate all of your firearms. and a very rare look at iran's spy network. it is a whole lot bigger than anyone in the pentagon thought. . so, um, whoever's fathered the most children, gets the most data. let's just do it by hair. body hair? most dental work. what? [ phones buzzing and beeping ] stop downloading, and stop liking everything.
4:28pm
it should be by who has the least amount of cartilage in their left knee. [ mom ] i just want to take a bath. [ male announcer ] say no to sharing. say yes to sprint. with truly unlimited data, text and calling. with truly unlimited you know it even after all these years. but your erectile dysfunction - you know,that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat,
4:29pm
or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial.
4:30pm
4:31pm
welcome back to the second half of "outfront." we start with stories we care about, where we'll focus on reporting from the front lines. students of sandy hook elementary went back to school today for the first time since the december 14th shooting in which 20 students were killed and six teachers. students have been relocated to a former middle school. it's been outfitted with rugs and furniture to replicate exactly the classrooms at sandy hook. and tonight, we have learned the former arizona congresswoman, gabby giffords, will be goinging newtown tomorrow and meeting with families. and a big money move in iraq.
4:32pm
we hear so many bad things about what's happening in iraq. here's a piece of progress. a cell phone company called asia cell is launching the first major stock ipo since the united states invaded iraq in 2003. according to bloomberg, the company is trying to raise $1.3 billion on the baghdad stock market. that's a very, very big number. i met the head of asia cell in iraq three years ago. at the time, he said the company would be iraq's first big ipo. it seemed a little bit like a dream then, but that bet could be paying off. asia cell is now one of the three biggest mobile phone operators in iraq. well, offshore drilling company transocean will pay $1.4 billion in fines and penalties for its part in the worst offshore oil spill in american history. the company's also going to plead guilty to violating the clean water act. transocean, you may recall, owned the actual deepwater horizon rig that sank after the explosion in which 11 were killed in 2010. the company most associated with the disaster, though, isn't transocean. it's bp.
4:33pm
and bp tells us that the settlement, i'll quote them, jr underscores what every official investigation has found, that the deepwater horizon accident resulted in multiple accidents from multiple parties. and five men have been charged with the brutal gang rape and death of a 23-year-old woman. a senior police official tells cnn the men were charged with murder, rape, and kidnapping in a new delhi court. the men allegedly attacked the woman and her male companion on a bus, robbed them, before dumping them on the side of the road. the woman's injuries were horrific. she died on saturday from them. and an official says that the trial is being fast tracked, that it will begin this week once all the evidence is gathered and authorities will seek the death penalty. well, secretary of state hillary clinton will be back at work next week. in a state department briefing, a spokeswoman says that clinton sounds upbeat and is looking
4:34pm
forward to getting back to work. she also says that clinton is committed to testifying on the benghazi attack, but did not specify when that will happen. it's been 518 days since the united states lost its top credit rating. what are we doing to get it back? well, today there was some good news on jobs. apparently we had 215,000 jobs added in december, more than economists were looking for. of course, the formal jobs number comes out tomorrow. and now our fourth story "outfront." a potentially major change to gun laws in the ited states. a maryland task force on guns and the mentally ill, here it is, it's a pretty interesting report, recommends that police should have the right to con phys case firearms from anyone who is deemed to be, quote, a threat to self or others. tonight, charles sophie and paul callan, who also represents psychiatrists in medical malpractice cases. so reading through this task force series of recommendations, they say, look, the biggest indicator that someone could be a problem to public safety or a
4:35pm
threat would be if they make a threat. some sort of a threat to themselves or a threat that i'm going to hurt you, i'm going to kill you. and that if any threats are made, you've got to report them to police, and police should then go to the person and take away any guns that this person might have, just based upon the person having made a threat. paul, is this significant? >> it's significant in that it will destroy my movement towards gun control or gun regulation in this country. this is the worst nightmare of everybody who favors the second amendment. and i'll tell you why. what this law would do is, it would put in law enforcement's hands the idea of deciding whether you're mentally ill or not. and then making a determination as to wether or not your weapons would be seized. under current law, if you are a threat to me, i can have you arrested now. you don't need a new law to do that. as a matter of fact, the law requires a psychiatrist to turn you in. as i'm sure dr. sophie will agree with me. >> all right, so dr. sophie, let me ask you, maryland already does have a law saying that people with mental illness who have been hospitalized for more than 30 days for mental illness oer a history of mental illness,
4:36pm
they're already not allowed to own firearms. so this extra step that paul's talking about, where you would take guns away from people who make threats against other people, is that necessary? >> yes, i definitely think that at some point, in certain people, they should have that extra step. because let me tell you, there are people out there who don't verbalize a lot of the things that they're thinking and will act. so we're really talking about a competency issue, not necessarily somebody with just a mental illness. and those it may seem discriminato discriminatory, it really is about the safety of that person as well as society. >> well, unless psychiatrists have developed some sort of a brain scan that could determine what people who are mentally disturbed are thinking, there's no way to enforce this law. millions of people in this country are on psychotropic medications right now, probably half the population of manhattan. are we going to look in all of their homes to see if they have guns because they're suffering from mental illness? it's just an unenforceable law. >> dr. sophy, what's your response to that?
4:37pm
you think about depression, people are hospitalized for that, that's a mental illness, a lot of people have dealt with that, are people who have had depression should be allowed to have guns? >> absolutely not. i know there needs to be a discussion, we'll start a discussion about the ability to keep people safer in all areas. but at that table has to be the law people, the medical people, children's and patients' rights people. all of the kinds of hipaa stuff that has to go into it. because anybody on a psy psychotropic medication should not be deemed incompetent not and able to have a gun, it is a process. and hopefully this is just the start of a discussion with many of the disciplines around the country to see if it is even something we should enforce. but definitely, there are people who should not have access to firearms. >> well, you know, doctor, these discussions wind up in courtrooms, eventually. so what are you -- are we going to have hundreds, thousands of trials about whether somebody constitutes a threat and whether they can have a firearm or not? right now, if you're mentally ill and you constitute a threat to somebody else, the law
4:38pm
permits you to be locked up in a mental institution. that's what the law says. why do we need a new law? nobody's taking guns into mental institutions, so what's it solving? and statistically, there's very little correlation between violence and the mentally ill, as i think even the task force conceded. >> dr. sophy? >> i hear what you're saying, but if someone isn't verbalizing it on or if you're a physician and you're taking care of somebody, you have the duty to warn. but if you're not able to be privy to that information and need deeper information, you have the ability by this law to do a competency evaluation, which is a little bit of deeper, further psychological testing to see how these people are thinking, how they're making their decisions. are they able to make a good judgment decision? those are the things that really all that you're ever going to be able to do, to be able to make a prediction if somebody could have a gun. >> let me ask you this, paul,
4:39pm
when you think about james holmes, the alleged aurora shooter, would -- this potentially could have stopped him, right? he had made threats. there were psychiatrists at the university who were aware of that, who had raised the issue. if there were a statute like this on the books in colorado, might it have prevented that massacre? >> that's a great question, and the answer is, no, it wouldn't have stopped it. he's very -- that guy, that kid had a psychiatrist who was seeing him on a regular basis. he had verbalized to the psychiatrist, she had an obligation, legally, to seek his involuntary commitment to a mental institution, if he was a threat to somebody else, and she didn't find that to be the case. so, existing law, if she was doing or had enough information to incarcerate him, he would have been incarcerated him. so this law wouldn't help at all. >> that's kind of shocking, dr. sophy, even with this law, she had the opportunity -- or chose not to do it. and there's always a hesitance, right, that you don't want to cause harm to someone if they really don't deserve it. nobody wants to put someone in
4:40pm
an institution, unless they really have to be. but that would mean, you know, in this case, the opportunity was missed. >> no, but, see, i'm not so sure that either she didn't have enough information to commit him in against his will, do a competency investigation to give you that further, deeper information to feel more confident one way or the other to make a decision. because if he's weighing there on that gray zone, you've got to do other stuff to get yourself clinically stable on one side of that -- >> and doctor, are you prepared to pay increased medical malpractice premiums? because you're going to get sued by the people that you do these competency hearings for. i'm defending two psychiatrists now who put someone into a mental institution, and those two people are now saying they were illegally jailed and they're suing their psychiatrists. so are you ready for more lawsuit ifs this thing goes into effect? >> i guess. i'm not going to live in fear, because i think any doctor needs to make the best decision they can and garth the most
4:41pm
information to make that an informed decision. and certainly no one should be hospitalized against their will or inappropriately, but you try to make the most informed decision and gather the right information. >> thank you, both of you. a tough one. let us know what you think about that, please. and now a new u.s. government report says that iran has built a dangerous spy network with tens of thousands of people working for it. these are numbers that shocked many at the pentagon. and tonight we have new details on how the iranian spy agency operates, who they're killing, and how much more powerful it might get. cnn's brian today is "outfront." >> reporter: assassination plots, terrorist bombings, cyberwarfare. tactics used around the world by iran's intelligence service. one of the largest and most aggressive spy operations in the world. that's according to a new report by government researchers commissioned by the pentagon. the report says iran's ministry of intelligence and security has 30,000 people working for it. that's compared to just over
4:42pm
100,000 in the 17 u.s. intelligence agencies and offices. >> from the standpoint of u.s. national security, western national security, what's the most dangerous operation that iranian intelligence has its hand in, do you think? >> well, i think the most dangerous thing they do, is terrorism. they have for decades now, developed networks with other terrorist groups, so they themselves don't necessarily have to do something. they can contract it out, they can encourage others to engage in terrorism against the united states and our allays. >> reporter: a former cia officer who tracked iranian intelligence through the middle east says the iranian agency of intelligence and security used to conduct most iranian-sponsored assassinations overseas. he says that unit killed the former iranian prime minister, assassinated in paris in 1991. but guret says now those operations have shifted to the feared quds force, the shadowy
4:43pm
iranian military unit that's part of the revolutionary guard. what's the military of intelligence's biggest job now? >> they're primarily used as an instrument of oppression, they know how to hurt people. >> reporter: the report also says the quds force is inside syria, backing president bashar al assad's forces. separate from the report, congressman peter king, chairman of the homeland security committee, has said that iran runs spies out of its mission to the u.n. and here at the iranian intrasection in washington. king made those comments after a plot was revealed to assassinate saudi arabia's ambassador to the u.s. the iranian-american who pleaded guilty in that case said he'd worked with iranian military people to formulate the plot. in the wake of that, king called for strong retaliation against iranian diplomats in the u.s. >> we, to me, should get rid of either all of them or most of them and send a clear signal. >> reporter: iranian officials denied any role in trying to assassinate the saudi ambassador
4:44pm
in washington. we called and e-mailed iran's mission to the u.n. for comment on the latest report on the country's intelligence operations. we got no response. brian todd, cnn, washington. and still to come, shocking allegations of rape in ohio. a video posted to the web of someone joking about the alleged attack has led to two arrests. and russian president vladimir putin continues his quest for power. you won't believe what we saw today. who do you think i am, quicken loans? ♪ at quicken loans, we won't make you wait for it. our efficient, online system allows us to get you through your home loan process fast. which means you'll never have to beg for a quick closing. one more way quicken loans is engineered to amaze. bonkers, look at me when i'm talking to you. one more way quicken loans is engineered to amaze. are you flo? yes. is this the thing you gave my husband? well, yeah, yes. the "name your price" tool.
4:45pm
you tell us the price you want to pay, and we give you a range of options to choose from. careful, though -- that kind of power can go to your head. that explains a lot. yo, buddy! i got this. gimme one, gimme one, gimme one! the power of the "name your price" tool. only from progressive.
4:46pm
4:47pm
4:48pm
our fifth story "outfront," shocking allegations of rape. two high school football players? steubenville, ohio, have been arrested and charged with raping a 16-year-old girl. after images and stories of the alleged assault began circulating on the web. the story actually started to unravel back in august, on the 11th of august, when a couple of teenagers started tweeting about the alleged crime after a night of drinking skpaeand partying. one of the tweets, "song of the night is definitely rape me by nirvana." an image of the girl being carried by two boys soon appeared on the internet, then a second video was posted on youtube, which was apparently recorded on the night of the attack. in it, a teenager from steuben highly reportedly jokes about the rape. we're going to show it to you, but we want to warn you, it's disturbing to watch. >> that's like rape. it is rape. i raped her. >> they raped her harder than that cop raped marcellus wallace
4:49pm
in "pulp fiction." you ever seen that? >> he comes up with them so quick. >> they raped her quicker than mike tyson rapedgirl. >> cnn's national correspondent, susan candiotti, is outfront tonight. i mean, that is -- that is horrific to hear. what is the defense saying? is there any evidence that others might be involved? unks of crab all the players?bi meat, just like this.players?bi but, you know, crab cakes have some fillers in there. what -- they use the saltine crackers. so they crack them up. they kind of make crumbs out of them. so i don't want everything very kind of crumby. very crumby. so we'll leave a little bit of big pieces. and here, even, so when you do your bread crumbs at home, do this as well, so you
4:50pm
have the two. you have the fine underneath, if you need, for the breading. but if you want a little bit more texture in the stuffing, add some of it here -- the big pieces. i still need some for the bottom. so i think that's good. kind of making an even split here. okay. okay, and i think maybe a little crunch on the outside, too, will be good. all right. so we have the bread crumbs, which we will use. let's collect everything here. now, the seasoning of this. and i don't think it really has much more than this -- certainly, the old bay seasoning. some of the mayo. and just enough to kind of moisten it. not really a lot, a lot, because you're going to be frying this,
4:51pm
and you don't want the crab cakes to fall apart. so. this is going to be good. and the big chunks, and just moist enough. don't mash it, don't over-work it. you want those big chunks of crab meat. mmm, the smell is really good. and then you shape them. you can -- the best is to put it in the refrigerator and let them chill a little bit so that you can roll them. but once they are chilled, you roll them in the crumbs that you have left, and you've got yourself a great crab meatball, should we say? the crab cakes have been in the refrigerator for about an hour, just to solidify, and now we've got to bread them and then fry them. not too much bread crumbs. as i told you, you know, in those crab cakes was a lot of crab meat, not too stodgy, nice and light, so just a little bit, just like that. you'll get yourself some
4:52pm
vegetable oil in a deep pot, make the oil fairly hot, but not too hot. let's see. [ sizzling ] yes. so let's put them in. one...two... and the temperature when you fry things, you know, it's a little high, but as you add elements to the frying oil, it sort of lowers and becomes the right temperature. and if it's too low, if you don't see it bubbling like that, then pick up the fire again. so, you know, mostly everything is cooked in here -- the crab meat -- so there's nothing, no major, really, cooking that you need done. but you want that crispiness, and you want it all to kind of pull together. okay.
4:53pm
okay, great. so let's check on the tomatoes. they should be ready, and we're ready to enjoy. so everything is ready. i'm going to taste, and i'm going to tell you how it tastes. now, you know, the tomatoes are great. they're great right out of the oven. you can -- they're great warm. i like them, actually, warm. but they're even good at room temperature. so a little tomato, a little juice. okay, that's that. let's get a nice crab cake right here. mmm, there's a little piece here. let me -- mmm! mmm-mmm-mmm! a little of the remoulade. i guess maybe just like that. mmm, that's enough.
4:54pm
i am going to taste. okay, so let's taste. you see the big chunks of crab meat? that's what's delicious. mmm. mmm, delicious. so let's try the tomatoes. mmm. you know what? perfect marriage. and i'm going to get into this, and i'm not going to have time for you, but i want to invite you. so, with a little bit of the friulano, tutti a tavola a mangiare. so come on! [ theme music playing ]
4:55pm
this companion cookbook, available for $35, contains every recipe featured in this season of "lidia's italy in america." in addition to her easy to make dishes, lidia shares stories about the unique artisans that she discovered. for $39.99, we'll send you the cookbook and the "best of lidia: pasta" dvd, a $54.99 value. to order, call 1-800-play-pbs, or visit shoppbs.org/lidia. to learn more about lidia and her family, to get recipes, tips, techniques and much more, visit us online at...
4:56pm
grana padano cheese, versatile and very italian. a dark chocolate and hazelnut kiss from the heart of italy. >> lidia: to clean your calamari is very simple. lay your calamari straight. put your fingers right here. and slowly pull out the head, and the whole intestines will come out with it. you cut it just behind the eyes. and you discard this.
4:57pm
the back, where you have the two wings, you will find the backbone. just slowly pull it out. this is -- it's a cartilage. you remove the two wings. just like that. and with it come the skin. and your calamari is clean.
4:58pm
4:59pm